Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
A comprehensive guide to SDLC, covering its phases, various models, and their advantages and disadvantages.
Introduction
The Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) is a structured process used in software development to ensure high-quality software is developed in a cost-effective and timely manner. It consists of multiple phases that guide the development process from planning to deployment and maintenance.
Phases of SDLC
- Requirement Analysis – Understanding project needs and gathering user requirements.
- Planning – Defining scope, resources, costs, and timelines.
- Design – Creating architecture and system design.
- Implementation (Coding) – Writing and compiling code based on design specifications.
- Testing – Verifying functionality, security, and performance.
- Deployment – Releasing the software for user access.
- Maintenance – Providing updates, fixing bugs, and improving performance.
SDLC Models
Different SDLC models define how these phases are carried out. Let’s explore them in detail.
1. Waterfall Model
About:
The Waterfall Model is a linear and sequential approach where each phase is completed before moving to the next.
How It Works:
- Requirements are gathered at the beginning.
- Phases progress in a step-by-step manner.
- Changes are difficult to accommodate once the process has started.
Pros:
✅ Simple and easy to understand.
✅ Works well for projects with clear requirements.
✅ Each phase has specific deliverables.
Cons:
❌ Not flexible for changes.
❌ High risk of failure if requirements are incorrect.
❌ Testing happens late, which can be costly.
2. Agile Model
About:
Agile is an iterative and flexible approach that delivers software in small, incremental cycles.
How It Works:
- Development is divided into short sprints (typically 2-4 weeks).
- Regular feedback is taken from customers.
- Continuous testing and improvement occur throughout development.
Pros:
✅ Highly flexible and adaptable.
✅ Frequent deliveries improve customer satisfaction.
✅ Continuous testing ensures quality.
Cons:
❌ Requires constant communication.
❌ Not suitable for small teams or projects with fixed budgets.
❌ Frequent changes can lead to scope creep.
3. Spiral Model
About:
The Spiral Model combines iterative development with risk assessment.
How It Works:
- Each iteration follows four phases: planning, risk analysis, development, and evaluation.
- Risks are identified and mitigated early.
- Used for large, complex projects with evolving requirements.
Pros:
✅ Risk management is a priority.
✅ Suitable for large-scale projects.
✅ Flexible and iterative.
Cons:
❌ Expensive due to risk management efforts.
❌ Complex and time-consuming.
❌ Requires experienced developers.
4. Iterative Model
About:
The Iterative Model develops software in repeated cycles, refining it over time.
How It Works:
- A basic version is built quickly and improved iteratively.
- Each cycle adds new features and fixes problems.
- Used when requirements are unclear at the start.
Pros:
✅ Allows feedback-driven improvements.
✅ Early software versions available.
✅ Suitable for changing requirements.
Cons:
❌ More resource-intensive than linear models.
❌ Requires strong planning.
❌ Design flaws may persist if not corrected early.
5. V-Model (Validation and Verification)
About:
The V-Model is an extension of the Waterfall Model where each development phase has a corresponding testing phase.
How It Works:
- Each phase has a corresponding validation stage.
- Testing is emphasized early in the process.
- Useful for safety-critical systems like medical and aviation software.
Pros:
✅ Testing is integrated early, reducing defects.
✅ Well-structured and easy to manage.
✅ Suitable for projects with strict validation requirements.
Cons:
❌ Rigid structure, not suitable for dynamic changes.
❌ High documentation overhead.
❌ Can be time-consuming.
Conclusion
Each SDLC model has its strengths and weaknesses. The choice of model depends on project requirements, flexibility, risk, and team structure. Understanding these models helps in selecting the best approach for software development.